Can Your PC Handle Pro Evolution Soccer 2017 System Requirements? Find Out Now
I remember the first time I installed Pro Evolution Soccer 2017 on my gaming rig back in 2016 - that mix of excitement and anxiety while waiting to see if my system could handle it. There's something uniquely frustrating about anticipating a gaming experience only to discover your hardware can't keep up. It reminds me of that basketball situation I read about recently, where a key player underwent an appendectomy and missed the Philippine Cup finals, causing his team to fall against San Miguel and dash their hopes for a season sweep. That's exactly how it feels when you're excited to play PES 2017 but your PC can't handle it - you're essentially sidelined from the action.
When Konami released PES 2017, they really pushed the boundaries of football simulation, and the system requirements reflected that ambition. The minimum requirements asked for at least an Intel Core i5-3450 or AMD FX-4100 processor, which was pretty standard for 2016. But here's where many gamers stumbled - the graphics card requirements. You needed at least a GeForce GTX 660 or Radeon HD 7850 with 2GB of VRAM. I've seen countless players make the mistake of thinking their integrated graphics could handle it, only to be met with choppy gameplay that feels like watching a slideshow rather than fluid football action. The memory requirement of 8GB RAM was another sticking point - many systems at the time were still rocking 4GB, which just wouldn't cut it for smooth gameplay.
What many people don't realize is that meeting the minimum requirements only gets you to the starting line - it's like showing up to play professional basketball without proper training. To truly enjoy PES 2017 the way the developers intended, you needed hardware that matched or exceeded the recommended specifications. The recommended CPU was an Intel Core i7-3770 or AMD FX-4170, and the graphics card needed to be at least a GeForce GTX 670 or Radeon HD 7950. I personally found that the game really shone when running on a GTX 970 with 16GB RAM - that's when the player animations, crowd details, and stadium atmospheres truly came to life without any frame rate drops during crucial moments.
Storage was another crucial factor that often gets overlooked. The game required about 15GB of available space, but with updates and additional content, you'd realistically need closer to 25GB. I made the mistake initially of installing it on my nearly-full SSD and experienced significant loading time issues until I cleared up more space. The DirectX requirement of version 11 also caught some players off guard, particularly those running older versions of Windows or using outdated graphics drivers. I'd estimate that about 30% of performance issues I've helped troubleshoot stemmed from outdated DirectX installations or graphics drivers.
The connection between hardware requirements and gaming experience became particularly clear to me when I upgraded my system. Before my upgrade, I was running the game on minimum settings with occasional stuttering during crowded scenes - it was like watching a team missing its key player, similar to how that basketball team struggled without their appendectomy-recovering star. After upgrading to meet the recommended specifications, the difference was night and day. Players moved with realistic weight and momentum, the ball physics felt authentic, and the overall presentation matched what I'd seen in professional reviews.
What's interesting is how PES 2017's requirements compare to today's standards. While it was considered moderately demanding in 2016, by today's metrics it's actually quite accessible. Most modern integrated graphics solutions can handle it reasonably well, and even budget gaming PCs from the last 3-4 years should have no trouble running it at medium to high settings. I recently tested it on a friend's system with a GTX 1050 Ti and was pleasantly surprised by how well it performed, maintaining a consistent 55-60 FPS at 1080p with high settings.
The operating system requirements were another area where players sometimes encountered surprises. The game officially supported Windows 10, 8.1, and 7 SP1, but I found that Windows 10 typically provided the best performance and compatibility. I helped a friend troubleshoot why the game wouldn't launch on his Windows 7 system, and it turned out he was missing a crucial service pack update. After updating, the game ran smoothly, though we did notice slightly longer loading times compared to my Windows 10 setup.
Looking back, PES 2017 represented a turning point in football gaming where the visual fidelity and physics complexity started demanding more from consumer hardware. While it wasn't as demanding as some AAA titles of its time, it certainly separated the capable systems from the inadequate ones. The experience taught me the importance of not just meeting minimum requirements but aiming for recommended specifications if you want the full, uninterrupted gaming experience. There's nothing worse than having your gaming session interrupted by technical issues when you're in the middle of an important match - it's like being pulled from the game right when your team needs you most, similar to that basketball player watching from the sidelines during the finals.
Ultimately, checking your system specifications before purchasing any game remains crucial, and PES 2017 serves as a perfect example of why this matters. The difference between meeting minimum and recommended requirements can transform your gaming experience from frustrating to fantastic. Having experienced both scenarios myself, I can confidently say that investing in adequate hardware pays dividends in gaming satisfaction. Whether you're playing sports games or any other genre, there's genuine value in ensuring your system can handle the software properly - it's the difference between watching from the bench and being in the game.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover