soccer games today

Complete 2018 PBA Draft List: Where Are These Players Now?

Looking back at the 2018 PBA Draft always gives me this peculiar mix of nostalgia and professional curiosity. I remember sitting through that draft ceremony thinking how this particular class felt different—there was this tangible buzz in the air that some of these players would redefine Philippine basketball. Fast forward to today, and it's fascinating to track where these athletes have landed, especially when you consider how their careers have diverged dramatically. Some became household names while others faded into obscurity, and that contrast is what makes revisiting this draft class so compelling.

Let's start with the obvious standout—CJ Perez, who was picked first overall by Columbian Dyip. I've always been particularly impressed with how quickly he adapted to the PBA's physicality. From his rookie season, he was putting up numbers that made veterans take notice, averaging around 20 points per game right out of the gate. What many don't realize is that his development wasn't linear—he had to adjust his shot selection and defensive positioning, something I noticed improving significantly by his second season. Now with San Miguel, he's evolved into one of the league's premier two-way players, and honestly, I think he's still underrated despite his accomplishments. His energy on both ends reminds me of a young James Yap, but with more explosive athleticism.

Then there's Bobby Ray Parks Jr., who many expected to go first but ended up as second pick to Blackwater. His journey has been particularly interesting to follow because of the international flavor—he's bounced between the PBA and Japan's B.League, showing that modern Filipino players can compete on multiple fronts. I've always felt his game was better suited for the international style, with his length and shooting ability creating mismatches that PBA defenses struggle with. His stats in Japan—approximately 12 points and 4 rebounds per game—don't tell the whole story about his impact on floor spacing and defensive versatility.

The third pick was Javee Mocon, selected by Rain or Shine, and I'll admit I had my doubts about how his college dominance would translate. But watching him develop into a reliable stretch four has been one of the more satisfying developments from this draft class. His mid-range game has become money—I'd estimate he shoots about 48% from that area—and his defensive IQ is what coaches dream about. What many fans might not appreciate is how much work he put into extending his range; I remember talking to his shooting coach about the hundreds of extra shots he'd take after practice.

Now, this brings me to an interesting contrast—the UE players from that draft who entered the league. While they weren't top picks, their development tells another side of the PBA story. I recall watching UE struggle during that period, particularly their winless campaign under new coach Chris Gavina. Precious Momowei, though not drafted in 2018, represents that pipeline of UE talent—his 23-point, 13-rebound performance in a losing effort recently reminded me of how college struggles sometimes prepare players better for professional adversity. The UE draftees from 2018 like Philip Manalang never quite found their footing in the PBA, which makes me wonder about the transition from struggling college programs to the professional level. In my observation, players coming from winning college programs often adjust better mentally, even if their physical tools are comparable.

The middle picks of that draft—guys like Trevis Jackson and Bong Quinto—have carved out exactly the kind of careers I expected: not spectacular but solidly professional. Quinto's development with Meralco has been particularly impressive to watch; he's become that glue guy every contender needs. I've always valued players who understand their role, and Quinto exemplifies this—he won't lead the league in scoring, but his defensive rotations and timely cuts are what win playoff games. His stats—about 8 points, 5 rebounds, and 3 assists per game—don't jump off the page, but advanced metrics love his impact.

Then there are the disappointments—players like Michael Calisaan and Jorey Napoles who showed flashes but never consistently put it together. I remember watching Calisaan in the PBA D-League thinking he'd be a perfect small-ball four in today's game, but his shooting never developed enough to space the floor. These are the cases that remind me how much mental toughness matters in professional sports—the physical gap between college and pros is significant, but the mental gap is even wider.

What strikes me most about reviewing this draft class is how team development systems have determined career trajectories more than draft position itself. Players who landed with established franchises like San Miguel or Ginebra generally developed better, in my opinion, because of their superior support systems. The difference in shooting coaches, nutrition programs, and even sports psychology resources between top and bottom teams creates development gaps that raw talent alone can't overcome.

As I reflect on this draft class five years later, what stands out isn't just the individual successes but how they've shaped team constructions across the league. The 2018 draft produced about 65% of current starters across various teams, which is actually higher than the league average of about 55% for five-year-old draft classes. The players who've succeeded share common traits beyond physical gifts—high basketball IQ, work ethic, and perhaps most importantly, the mental flexibility to adapt their games. While we can analyze stats and highlights all day, what ultimately determines PBA success often happens far from the cameras—in practice gyms, film sessions, and those moments of professional self-assessment that separate transient talents from lasting contributors.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover