soccer games today

Can Your PC Handle Pro Evolution Soccer 2017 System Requirements?

I remember the day Pro Evolution Soccer 2017 launched back in September 2016 - I rushed to install it on my gaming rig only to discover my graphics card was struggling with the new Fox Engine enhancements. That moment taught me the importance of checking system requirements before purchasing games, much like how professional athletes need to understand their physical limitations before competing. Speaking of athletes, there's an interesting parallel with basketball - I recently read about a player who underwent an appendectomy and missed the Philippine Cup finals where his team, Tropang 5G, fell against San Miguel, ending their season sweep hopes. This medical setback reminds me that whether in sports or gaming, proper preparation and understanding your system's capabilities are crucial for optimal performance.

When Konami released PES 2017, they significantly upgraded the game's visual fidelity and physics engine. The minimum requirements called for at least an Intel Core i5-3450 processor and NVIDIA GTX 660, while the recommended specs pushed users toward an i7-3770 coupled with GTX 760. I'd estimate about 40% of PC gamers at the time needed to upgrade at least one component to enjoy the game properly. The memory requirements jumped to 8GB RAM - double what many casual gamers had installed. What many people don't realize is that sports games often demand more from your system than they appear to, since they're simulating complex physics and AI routines beneath those polished graphics.

I've tested PES 2017 across multiple hardware configurations, and the difference between meeting minimum versus recommended specs is dramatic. With minimum specs, you're looking at 720p resolution with medium settings, barely hitting 45 frames per second during crowded penalty box situations. Meanwhile, the recommended setup delivers buttery smooth 60fps at 1080p with high detail settings. Personally, I found the sweet spot to be a GTX 950 paired with 16GB RAM - this gave me consistent performance even during rainy weather matches when the particle effects really tax your system.

Storage requirements often catch people off guard - PES 2017 needed about 15GB of free space, but with updates and additional content, I'd recommend keeping 25GB available. The game's loading times improved dramatically when installed on an SSD rather than traditional hard drives. I timed it once - matches loaded in about 12 seconds from my Samsung 850 EVO versus nearly 35 seconds from my Western Digital mechanical drive. That difference matters when you're in the middle of an exciting Master League campaign and just want to jump into the next match.

Online gameplay introduces another layer of system demands. Konami's servers required stable internet connections with at least 3Mbps upload speed for smooth multiplayer matches. I learned this the hard way when my old internet plan caused frustrating lag during crucial online matches. The netcode has improved since the PES 2016 days, but you'll still notice input delay if your system is struggling to maintain both game performance and network synchronization simultaneously.

What fascinates me about sports games is how they mirror real-world athletic challenges. Just as that basketball player's appendectomy affected his team's championship aspirations, having underpowered PC components can ruin your gaming experience. I've seen players blame the game for poor performance when the real issue was their aging hardware. It's like expecting an athlete to perform without proper training or medical clearance - the results will inevitably disappoint.

Through my testing, I discovered that CPU performance matters more than most people realize for sports games. While everyone focuses on graphics cards, PES 2017's AI calculations and physics simulations are heavily CPU-dependent. During crowded midfield battles with multiple players interacting, I observed CPU usage spiking to nearly 80% on my i5-6600K, while my GPU usage remained around 60%. This pattern suggests that investing in a better processor might benefit PES players more than upgrading their graphics card, contrary to conventional gaming wisdom.

The visual improvements in PES 2017 justified the higher system requirements in my opinion. Player models showed realistic sweat effects, kits wrinkled naturally during movement, and the lighting system created authentic stadium atmospheres. These enhancements required DirectX 11 compatibility and substantial VRAM - my tests showed the game utilizing up to 3GB of video memory at 1080p resolution. Players with older 2GB cards experienced texture streaming issues, particularly during camera cuts to close-ups of celebrating players after goals.

I maintain that PES 2017 represented a turning point for sports gaming on PC. The system requirements established a new baseline that forced many gamers to upgrade. Much like how that basketball team had to recalibrate their strategy after losing a key player to surgery, PC gamers needed to reassess their hardware to fully enjoy Konami's football masterpiece. The game's demanding nature ultimately pushed the industry forward, encouraging hardware manufacturers to develop more accessible mid-range components that could handle modern sports simulations.

Looking back, PES 2017's system requirements seem modest compared to today's standards, but they served as an important reality check for the gaming community. We learned that sports games were becoming increasingly sophisticated and that our hardware needed to evolve accordingly. Just as athletes must continuously train and sometimes undergo procedures to maintain peak performance, our gaming systems require regular updates and maintenance. The lesson remains relevant today - whether you're competing on the virtual pitch or the actual court, proper preparation and understanding your limitations make all the difference between victory and disappointment.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover