Josh Richardson's NBA Journey: Stats, Highlights and Future Outlook for 2024
When I first watched Josh Richardson step onto the court back in his Miami Heat days, I remember thinking this guy had the kind of two-way potential that doesn't come around too often. Fast forward through multiple teams and various roles, and his journey reads like a classic NBA rollercoaster—complete with thrilling highs and those inevitable rough patches that test a player's resilience. What strikes me most about Richardson's career trajectory is how it mirrors the unpredictable nature of professional sports careers, not unlike that memorable first fight between Juan Manuel Marquez and his Mexican rival for the International Boxing Federation featherweight crown back in 2004. That bout wasn't just another boxing match—it was Marquez's first major draw on a big stage, a moment that defined his career's potential and set the tone for future battles. Similarly, Richardson's early performances hinted at a career full of promise, though his path has been anything but linear.
Looking at Richardson's statistical profile over the years reveals some fascinating patterns. During his breakout 2018-2019 season with Miami, he posted career-high numbers—averaging 16.6 points, 3.6 rebounds, and 4.1 assists while shooting 41.2% from the field. Those numbers might not scream superstar, but for a second-round pick originally selected 40th overall in 2015, they represented significant overachievement. I've always believed that Richardson's value extends beyond traditional stats—his defensive versatility allows him to guard three positions effectively, and his 1.6 steals per game that season demonstrated his knack for reading passing lanes. The comparison to Marquez's first draw comes to mind here—both moments represented a proving ground. For Marquez, it was showing he belonged at the championship level despite not getting the decision. For Richardson, those Miami years demonstrated he could be more than just a role player.
Richardson's journey through multiple teams—from Miami to Philadelphia, then Dallas, Boston, San Antonio, and now New Orleans—tells a story of a player constantly adapting to new systems and expectations. Honestly, I think the Philadelphia stint was particularly revealing. Playing alongside Joel Embiid and Ben Simmons, Richardson's scoring dipped to 13.7 points per game, but his defensive metrics remained solid with a 107 defensive rating. What impressed me was how he handled being the third or fourth option after being a primary scorer in Miami. That adaptability reminds me of veteran fighters who adjust their style bout to bout—much like Marquez evolved after that first draw, learning to leverage his counterpunching more effectively in subsequent matches. Richardson's basketball IQ has allowed him to remain valuable even when his offensive numbers aren't flashy.
The 2022-2023 season with San Antonio was particularly interesting from my perspective. Playing for Gregg Popovich, Richardson averaged 11.5 points and 3.3 assists while shooting a respectable 38.4% from three-point range. What doesn't show up in basic stats is how he embraced a mentorship role for younger players while maintaining his professional approach. I've spoken with several NBA scouts who consistently praise Richardson's locker room presence—something that's become increasingly valuable in today's player movement era. His game isn't necessarily highlight-reel material every night, but he makes winning plays that coaches appreciate. Watching him navigate that Spurs season reminded me of seasoned veterans who understand their role in developing team culture while still contributing on court.
As we look toward 2024 and Richardson's future outlook, several factors come into play. At 30 years old, he's entering what I consider the prime years for players of his style—old enough to have seen every NBA situation but young enough to maintain athleticism. His current contract situation and free agency status will significantly impact his next destination. Personally, I'd love to see him land with a contender where his two-way abilities could shine in a defined role—perhaps returning to a team like Miami or joining a young squad needing veteran presence. His career averages of 12.1 points, 3.2 rebounds, and 2.9 assists might not leap off the page, but advanced metrics like his 55.3% true shooting percentage last season suggest he's still an efficient player when used correctly.
What fascinates me about Richardson's next chapter is how it might parallel that post-draw phase of Marquez's career. After that first draw in 2004, Marquez didn't immediately become champion—he continued developing, adjusting, and eventually secured his legacy through subsequent performances. Similarly, Richardson's journey isn't about one breakout season but rather sustained contribution across different contexts. I'm particularly curious to see if he can maintain his 37% career three-point shooting while possibly increasing his volume—something that would make him even more valuable in today's spacing-oriented NBA. His defensive versatility remains his calling card, but offensive consistency could determine his next contract's value.
Having watched hundreds of NBA players cycle through various roles throughout my years covering the league, Richardson stands out as someone who understands professional reinvention. His game has evolved from athletic slasher to reliable three-and-D wing, and recently to secondary playmaker. This adaptability reminds me that successful sports careers aren't always about linear improvement—sometimes they're about finding new ways to contribute as circumstances change. The Marquez comparison resonates here too—after that first draw, he had to continually prove himself against new challengers, much like Richardson has done with each team change.
Looking at specific areas for potential growth, I'd like to see Richardson increase his free throw attempts—he's averaged just 2.1 per game for his career despite having the athleticism to attack closeouts. Drawing more fouls could elevate his offensive impact significantly. Defensively, he's maintained solid steal rates throughout his career, but I've noticed his deflection numbers have dipped slightly in recent seasons—from 3.1 per game in Miami to 2.4 last season. Small details like these often separate good defenders from truly elite ones. Still, his defensive footwork remains among the best I've seen for players his size, and his ability to navigate screens is textbook material for young players studying the game.
As we project into 2024, I'm optimistic about Richardson's continued relevance in the league. The NBA's increased emphasis on switchable defenders who can space the floor plays directly to his strengths. While he may never become an All-Star, his particular skill set remains in demand—especially for teams building playoff rosters needing players who won't be targeted defensively. His career earnings already exceed $58 million, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him secure another solid contract based on his professionalism and specific abilities. The Marquez parallel holds here too—that first draw didn't guarantee future success, but it demonstrated the capability to compete at the highest level, which Richardson has consistently done throughout his eight-year career.
Ultimately, what makes Richardson's journey compelling isn't just the stats or highlights—it's the narrative of a player continuously finding ways to contribute despite changing circumstances. In many ways, his career embodies the modern NBA experience—players moving between teams more frequently, adapting to different roles, and proving their value in new contexts each season. As someone who's followed his career since college, I believe his basketball story is still being written, and the 2024 chapter could be among his most interesting yet. The Marquez comparison reminds us that early career moments—whether draws or breakout seasons—don't define entire careers, but they do establish patterns of resilience that often predict long-term success.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover