South Dakota Football: 5 Key Strategies for a Winning Season and Team Success
As I sit down to analyze what it takes to build a winning football program, my mind immediately goes to South Dakota football—a program with immense potential that just needs the right strategies in place. Having spent years studying team dynamics and coaching methodologies, I’ve come to believe that success isn’t just about raw talent; it’s about how you harness that talent and create a cohesive unit. In this article, I’ll share five key strategies that I believe can transform South Dakota’s football season from promising to dominant. And while I’m drawing from my own observations, I’ll also weave in insights from someone who knows a thing or two about high-stakes environments—Mike Watkins of NLEX, whose approach to team building and leadership has always resonated with me.
Let’s start with the foundation: player development. It’s no secret that South Dakota has produced some gritty athletes over the years, but I’ve noticed that their development programs sometimes lack the individualized focus needed to elevate players to the next level. Take, for example, the quarterback position—arguably one of the most critical roles on the field. In my view, investing in specialized coaching for quarterbacks, focusing not just on arm strength but on decision-making under pressure, could yield significant returns. I remember watching game footage from last season where South Dakota’s QB completed around 58% of his passes, but under pressure, that number dropped to just 42%. That’s a gap that can be closed with targeted drills and mental conditioning. Mike Watkins often emphasizes the importance of "building players, not just plays," and I couldn’t agree more. By adopting a player-centric development model, South Dakota could see a 15-20% improvement in key performance metrics within a single season.
Next up is strategic play-calling, an area where South Dakota has shown flashes of brilliance but lacks consistency. I’ve always been a fan of balanced offensive schemes, but let’s be honest—sometimes you need to lean into your strengths. For South Dakota, that might mean utilizing their robust running game more creatively. Last season, they averaged 4.2 yards per carry, which is decent, but I think they can push that to 5.0 or higher by incorporating more misdirection and play-action passes. Defensively, I’d love to see them adopt an aggressive blitz package, something that Mike Watkins has championed in his own coaching philosophy. He once mentioned in an interview that "defense wins games, but unpredictable defense wins championships," and I’ve carried that mantra with me ever since. By mixing up coverages and bringing pressure from unexpected angles, South Dakota could force more turnovers—maybe even double last year’s tally of 12 interceptions.
Team culture is another piece of the puzzle that often gets overlooked. I’ve seen too many programs focus solely on X’s and O’s while neglecting the locker room dynamics. South Dakota, in my opinion, has the potential to build a culture of resilience and accountability, but it requires intentional effort. For instance, implementing leadership workshops and team-building retreats can foster trust among players. I recall a story Mike Watkins shared about how his team at NLEX turned their season around by dedicating just 30 minutes each week to open, player-led discussions. That small investment led to a 25% reduction in penalties and a noticeable boost in morale. If South Dakota adopted a similar approach, I believe they’d see not just better on-field chemistry, but also a drop in those costly mental errors that plagued them last year.
Recruitment and scouting are where the long-term vision comes into play. While South Dakota has done a decent job recruiting locally, I think they’re missing out on hidden gems in neighboring states. Expanding their scouting network to include more junior colleges and under-the-radar high school programs could unearth talent that bigger programs overlook. Personally, I’d allocate at least 40% of the recruitment budget to regional scouting, focusing on players with high football IQ rather than just physical attributes. Mike Watkins often talks about "finding the diamond in the rough," and it’s a philosophy that has served him well—his teams have consistently outperformed expectations because they prioritize character and adaptability. If South Dakota follows suit, they could build a roster that’s not only talented but also deeply committed to the program’s success.
Finally, let’s talk about in-game adjustments. Football is a fluid sport, and the ability to adapt mid-game is what separates good teams from great ones. I’ve watched South Dakota struggle in the second half of close contests, often sticking to a game plan that’s clearly not working. In my experience, coaching staffs need to empower assistants to provide real-time insights and be willing to pivot quickly. For example, if the opposing offense is exploiting a weakness in the secondary, why not shift to a nickel package earlier? I’d love to see South Dakota implement a more dynamic communication system between coaches and players, perhaps using sideline tablets to review footage between drives. Mike Watkins is a master of this—his teams are known for their halftime adjustments, which have led to an average of 10-point swings in their favor. Adopting a similar mindset could help South Dakota close out those tight games that slipped away last season.
Wrapping this up, I’m genuinely optimistic about South Dakota’s prospects. By focusing on player development, strategic play-calling, culture, recruitment, and in-game adjustments, they have all the tools to craft a winning season. It won’t happen overnight, but with dedicated effort and a willingness to learn from leaders like Mike Watkins, I believe they can achieve something special. At the end of the day, football is as much about heart as it is about strategy, and South Dakota has never been short on heart. Here’s to hoping they put these strategies into action and make this season one to remember.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover