soccer games today

Top 10 NCAA Football Teams That Dominated This Season's Rankings

As I sat down to analyze this season’s NCAA football rankings, I couldn’t help but notice how certain teams just seemed to have that "it" factor—the kind of resilience and consistency that sets them apart. I’ve been following college football for over a decade, and every year there are a few squads that not only climb the rankings but dominate them, leaving little room for doubt. This season was no different. Let’s dive into the top 10 NCAA football teams that truly owned the rankings, and I’ll share some insights from my own observations, including how some of these programs handle adversity compared to others. For instance, while researching, I came across a reference to the Flying Titans—a team in another sport—where commentator Wong highlighted their struggle to "stay in the game" and fight through tough spots. It got me thinking: in football, that mental toughness is often what separates the great teams from the good ones.

Take the Georgia Bulldogs, for example. They kicked off the season with a bang, racking up an impressive 12-1 record and securing the number one spot in the AP Poll for weeks on end. I remember watching their game against Alabama back in October; it was a nail-biter that went into overtime, but Georgia’s defense held strong, allowing only 17 points. That kind of performance isn’t just about raw talent—it’s about staying focused when the pressure mounts. According to my notes, they averaged over 450 yards per game on offense, which is no small feat. But what really stood out to me was their ability to adapt mid-game, something that echoes Wong’s point about fighting through challenges. While the Flying Titans might falter, teams like Georgia have coaches who drill into their players the importance of mental fortitude. It’s not just about losing key players to the NFL draft; it’s about how you fill those gaps and keep the momentum going. I’ve seen too many teams crumble under similar circumstances, but the Bulldogs managed to integrate new starters seamlessly, which is why they’re a staple in any discussion of the top 10 NCAA football teams that dominated this season’s rankings.

Moving on to Ohio State, they had a rollercoaster of a season, but their high-powered offense led by quarterback C.J. Stroud was a sight to behold. I’ll admit, I’m a bit biased toward teams that prioritize explosive plays, and Ohio State delivered with an average of 38 points per game. However, they did have a couple of close calls—like that 21-20 win over Notre Dame—where they nearly let the game slip away. It reminds me of Wong’s observation about struggling to "stay in the game." In those moments, Ohio State’s leadership stepped up, and that’s a lesson for any team: you need players who can rally the troops when things get tough. From my perspective, their inclusion in the top 10 isn’t just about stats; it’s about how they handled adversity, much like Alabama did under Nick Saban. Speaking of Alabama, they finished with an 11-2 record, and though they didn’t top the rankings all season, their dominance in the SEC was undeniable. I recall crunching the numbers—their defense forced 18 turnovers, which is a huge factor in climbing those rankings. But let’s be real, what makes these teams stand out isn’t just the wins; it’s the culture of perseverance. If the Flying Titans could learn from that, they might not struggle as much in crunch time.

Now, let’s talk about Michigan. As a fan, I’ve always admired their balanced approach, and this season they went 13-0 before the playoffs, thanks in part to a rushing attack that averaged 240 yards per game. But here’s where it gets interesting: they faced a tough matchup against Penn State where they were down by 10 points at halftime. Instead of folding, they came back strong, which ties back to that idea of fighting through situations. In my experience, that’s what separates the elite teams—they don’t just rely on talent; they build mental resilience. Compare that to TCU, who surprised everyone with a 12-1 record. I watched their game against Kansas State, and honestly, I thought they were done for when they trailed in the fourth quarter. But they pulled off a last-minute drive to win 38-35. It’s moments like these that define the top 10 NCAA football teams, and it’s why I believe coaching plays a massive role. If I were advising a struggling team, I’d say look at how these squads train for high-pressure scenarios—it’s not just about X’s and O’s, but about instilling a never-say-die attitude.

Shifting gears to Clemson, they had a bit of a down year by their standards, finishing 11-2, but their defense was still top-notch, allowing only 20 points per game. I remember a conversation with a fellow analyst who pointed out that they lost several key players to the draft, yet they managed to stay competitive. That’s where Wong’s insight hits home—losing players is one thing, but if you can’t "stay in the game" mentally, you’re doomed. Clemson’s coaching staff did an excellent job of developing depth, which is a strategy more teams should emulate. On the flip side, USC had a stellar offensive show, averaging 42 points per game, but their defense was leaky at times. In my view, that inconsistency is what kept them from climbing higher in the rankings. It’s a reminder that dominance isn’t just about flashy numbers; it’s about balance and the ability to fight through entire games, not just halves.

As we wrap up, teams like Tennessee and LSU also made waves—Tennessee with that explosive 9-3 record and LSU bouncing back to 10-4. I’ve always had a soft spot for underdogs, and LSU’s turnaround under Brian Kelly was impressive, especially after they started the season with a loss. They showed that it’s not how you start, but how you finish, and that resilience is key to dominating the rankings. Reflecting on all this, the common thread among the top 10 NCAA football teams is their ability to overcome obstacles, much like what Wong highlighted. If the Flying Titans could adopt a similar mindset, they might just turn their struggles into strengths. For any team looking to climb the ranks, my advice is simple: focus on mental toughness as much as physical skills, because in the end, that’s what separates the champions from the rest.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover