soccer games today

I remember the first time I truly understood the Triangle Offense—it was during a late-night film session back in my coaching days. We were analyzing the 1990s Chicago Bulls, watching Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen move with this almost telepathic synchronization. The beauty of this system isn't just in its complexity, but in how it fundamentally changed what we consider "good basketball." When Phil Jackson's teams were running this offense to perfection, they weren't just winning championships—they were demonstrating a basketball philosophy that would influence generations to come.

The Triangle, or Triple-Post Offense as Tex Winter originally called it, creates what I like to think of as "structured creativity." Unlike more rigid systems where players have specific spots and predetermined movements, the Triangle provides a framework that adapts to the defense in real-time. I've always been fascinated by how it creates what statisticians call "high-probability scoring opportunities"—during the Bulls' second three-peat from 1996-1998, they consistently maintained offensive ratings above 115, which was astronomical for that era. What makes the Triangle so revolutionary is how it balances individual talent with team execution. It's not about running plays—it's about reading situations and making the right basketball decisions. This reminds me of that quote from coach Asuncion about sticking to the game plan while maintaining balance: "We don't want to get ahead of ourselves. We would want to come out with balanced lineups... We will stick to the game plan that we came here with." That's the essence of the Triangle—it's a system that prevents teams from getting ahead of themselves while allowing for strategic flexibility.

From my perspective, the most underappreciated aspect of the Triangle is how it democratizes offensive responsibility. In traditional systems, you might have one or two primary ball handlers, but in the Triangle, all five players become decision-makers. I've seen this firsthand when working with college programs implementing Triangle principles—the transformation in players' basketball IQ is remarkable. They start seeing passing lanes they never noticed before, understanding spacing at a deeper level. The system forces constant communication and awareness. During the Lakers' championship runs in the early 2000s, they averaged around 25 assists per game—not because they had extraordinary passers, but because the system created natural passing opportunities.

Modern analytics actually support what Triangle advocates have been saying for decades. The offense naturally creates what today's analysts call "efficient shots"—corner threes, shots at the rim, and free throws. When you break down the spacing in the Triangle, you'll find it consistently generates approximately 8-12 feet of separation between players, which is exactly what modern spacing principles recommend. The difference is that while many contemporary systems rely heavily on pick-and-roll actions (which account for nearly 32% of all NBA possessions today), the Triangle creates advantages through player and ball movement rather than relying on specific two-man actions.

What I find particularly compelling is how the Triangle's principles have been absorbed into modern basketball, even if teams aren't running the offense in its pure form. The Golden State Warriors' motion offense, for instance, incorporates many Triangle concepts—constant screening, perimeter interchange, and post-to-perimeter passing. Steve Kerr, who played in the Triangle system, has openly discussed how it influenced his coaching philosophy. The emphasis on reading defenses rather than memorizing plays, the importance of spacing and timing—these are all Triangle legacies that have become fundamental to how we teach basketball today.

The system does have its critics, and I'll admit it's not for every team. It requires specific personnel—players who can pass, shoot, and make quick decisions. In an era where specialization has become more common, finding five players who can all handle these responsibilities can be challenging. I've had conversations with coaches who argue that the Triangle is too complex for today's game, that players don't have the patience to learn it. But I push back on that notion—what we're really talking about is fundamental basketball intelligence, and that's timeless.

Looking at the current landscape, I'm convinced we're due for a Triangle renaissance. With the game becoming increasingly positionless, the Triangle's principles of spacing, cutting, and reading defenses are more relevant than ever. The system teaches players to play basketball rather than just running plays, and that distinction is crucial for long-term development. Teams that embrace these concepts will find themselves better prepared for playoff basketball, where defensive schemes become more sophisticated and predictable actions get shut down.

The true genius of the Triangle Offense lies in its adaptability and its emphasis on fundamental basketball. It's not about running perfect patterns—it's about making the right reads and playing unselfish basketball. In many ways, it represents the highest form of team offense because it requires complete buy-in from every player. As the game continues to evolve, the core principles of the Triangle—spacing, player movement, and intelligent decision-making—will remain relevant. The system revolutionized basketball not because it was perfect, but because it taught us what's possible when you trust players to make decisions within a structured framework. That lesson continues to shape how we think about offense today, and honestly, I don't see that changing anytime soon.