The Rise and Future of US Women's Soccer: What's Next for the Team
The roar of the crowd was still ringing in my ears as I settled into my seat at the Arthur Ashe Stadium, the crisp night air carrying that distinct electric charge only a major tournament can generate. I’d just watched a masterclass in composure from two young phenoms, Alex Eala and Coco Gauff, who dismantled their opponents with a kind of joyful, relentless efficiency. Their 6–2, 6–3 win over Tyra Grant and Lisa Pigato on Tuesday night wasn't just a match; it felt like a preview. Watching them, I couldn't help but draw a parallel line to another court, another pitch, another group of women who have captured the nation's imagination. It got me thinking deeply about the journey, the expectations, and the immense pressure that comes with carrying a legacy forward. It got me thinking about The Rise and Future of US Women's Soccer: What's Next for the Team.
You see, I’ve been a fan of US Women's Soccer since the iconic 1999 World Cup win. I was a kid then, watching Brandi Chastain’s penalty kick on a grainy television, and it felt like a seismic shift. That team didn't just win a trophy; they built a foundation. They turned a sport into a movement. For decades, they were the undisputed gold standard, the team that combined technical skill with an unbreakable, almost intimidating, will to win. They were pioneers, and we, the fans, got used to a certain level of dominance. We expected it. But sitting in that stadium, watching the 19-year-old Eala, ranked No. 64 in the world, and Gauff, world No. 3, seamlessly blend raw talent with veteran poise, I realized something crucial. The landscape has irrevocably changed. The rest of the world isn't just catching up; in some facets, they've sprinted ahead. The era of simply showing up and expecting to win is over, and the future of the US Women's National Team is now the most compelling, and perhaps most challenging, story in sports.
The rise was meteoric, almost storybook. From that '99 moment, the team became a symbol of American excellence and gender equality. They fought for, and won, better pay and working conditions, setting a global benchmark. They racked up four World Cup titles and four Olympic gold medals, a staggering haul that seemed to confirm their permanent place at the summit. I remember the 2015 and 2019 World Cup runs with a particular fondness; the team was a perfect blend of veteran leadership from players like Megan Rapinoe and Carli Lloyd and explosive new talent. They played with a swagger that was earned, a confidence that felt unshakeable. But what happens when the pillars of that era begin to retire? When the tactical innovations that once set you apart become the global standard? This is the precipice on which the team now stands.
This transition reminds me so much of what I witnessed with Eala and Gauff. They aren't just playing for today; they are part of a new wave, a generation that grew up watching the legends and is now tasked with forging their own path. Gauff, at just 20, already carries the weight of expectation with a grace that belies her age. Similarly, the USWNT now has its own cohort of young stars—players like Sophia Smith, Trinity Rodman, and Naomi Girma. They are phenomenally talented, arguably more technically gifted as a collective than any previous generation. But talent alone doesn't win championships. It's that intangible quality, that "clutch" gene, that the old guard had in spades. Can this new core develop it? Can they handle the pressure of a penalty shootout in a World Cup quarterfinal with the same ice-cool demeanor that defined their predecessors? I believe they can, but I also think it's naive to assume it's a given. They have to build their own identity, one that honors the past but isn't shackled by it.
Frankly, the recent performance at the 2023 World Cup, where the team was knocked out in the round of 16, was a wake-up call. Some pundits called it a failure; I see it as a necessary, albeit painful, recalibration. The world has seen the blueprint. Teams like Spain, England, and Sweden now play a sophisticated, possession-based style that can neutralize the US's traditional athletic and direct approach. The gap has closed to maybe just 2 or 3 percentage points, but in elite sports, that's a chasm. The federation's task is monumental: they must overhaul the development pipeline, invest in tactical education from the youth levels up, and perhaps most importantly, manage this generational handover with wisdom and foresight. We can't just rely on finding the next Mia Hamm; we need to build a system that produces twenty of her.
So, what's next? For me, the future is incredibly bright, but it demands patience from us fans. We have to allow this team to grow, to stumble, and to learn. The victory I saw from Eala and Gauff wasn't just about the scoreline; it was about their partnership, their problem-solving on the fly, their resilience. That's the model. The new USWNT needs to find its own version of that synergy. They need to develop a tactical flexibility that allows them to win ugly 1-0 grinders just as effectively as they win 4-0 blowouts. The core of the team, in my opinion, should be built around the midfield dynamism of someone like Sam Coffey, the defensive solidity of Girma, and the attacking ruthlessness of Smith. They need about 35 to 40 more caps together as a unit to develop that almost telepathic understanding that the great teams possess.
In the end, the story of US Women's Soccer is entering its most fascinating chapter. The easy dominance is gone, replaced by a fierce, global competition that will only make the sport better. The rise was about breaking barriers and establishing a dynasty. The future is about evolution, about proving that the system and the spirit built over the past 30 years are robust enough to sustain another golden age. It won't be easy, and there will be more stumbles along the way. But if the determination and raw talent of the new generation are any indication, the next great US Women's Soccer team is already being forged, one challenging match at a time. And as a fan who has been on this ride since the beginning, I can't wait to see what they become.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover