UAAP Women's Basketball Standing Updates and Current Team Rankings Analysis
Walking into the packed arena on game day, you can feel the tension in the air—the kind that separates contenders from pretenders in the UAAP Women's Basketball scene. As someone who's followed collegiate hoops for over a decade, I've seen how strategic pacing can define a team's identity, much like Coach Tim Cone’s approach with the Kings, where he emphasized controlling the tempo to grind out low-scoring wins. That philosophy resonates deeply with what we're observing this season: teams aren't just playing to score; they're playing to control the game, and it's reshaping the standings in fascinating ways. Let me break down the current rankings and share why I think this strategic shift is more than just a trend—it's a game-changer.
Right now, the leaderboard is tighter than ever, with the University of the Philippines (UP) Fighting Maroons holding a slim lead at 6-1, thanks to their methodical, defense-first mindset. I've always admired how they mirror that Kings-style approach Cone mentioned, where keeping scores low—like in their recent 58-54 nail-biter against the Ateneo Blue Eagles—allows them to capitalize on opponents' mistakes. It's not the flashiest basketball, but boy, does it work. UP's average points allowed per game sit at a stingy 52.3, which, in my view, is the backbone of their success. Following closely, the De La Salle Lady Archers are at 5-2, and I can't help but feel they're the dark horse here. Their offense is more explosive, averaging 68 points, but they've shown vulnerability in high-tempo games, dropping a 65-70 decision to UP that highlighted how a slowed-down pace can throw them off. As a fan, I lean toward teams that master the grind, and UP's consistency in low-scoring affairs—reminiscent of the Kings' 73-71 series opener—makes them my pick to clinch the title, even if it's not always pretty to watch.
Digging deeper into the stats, the National University (NU) Lady Bulldogs are sitting at 4-3, and I've got to say, their rollercoaster season puzzles me. They started strong but faltered in games where the pace escalated, like that 75-80 loss to the University of Santo Tomas (UST) Growling Tigers, who are currently 3-4 and fighting to stay relevant. UST, in my opinion, lacks the defensive discipline to thrive in a slowed game, and it shows in their 62.5 points allowed average—too high for a team aiming for the top four. Then there's the Adamson Lady Falcons at 2-5, and honestly, I think they're in trouble. They've been caught in shootouts, averaging 71 points scored but giving up 74, which tells me they're missing that Kings-like control Cone praised. In a league where every possession counts, I believe Adamson's inability to dictate tempo will keep them in the lower rungs, unless they pull off a major adjustment soon.
What strikes me most, though, is how this season echoes broader trends in basketball, where analytics favor efficiency over sheer firepower. From my experience covering sports, I've seen teams rise by embracing a "less is more" ethos, and in the UAAP, that's playing out in real time. Take the Far Eastern University (FEU) Lady Tamaraws, for instance, who are at 1-6 but recently pushed UP to a 56-60 finish by slowing the game down—proof that even underdogs can compete with smart pacing. It's a lesson I wish more teams would adopt; after all, as Cone illustrated, a 73-71 win isn't just about points—it's about control, and in women's basketball, that control is becoming the ultimate differentiator.
Wrapping this up, I'm convinced that the teams who master the art of the slow burn, like UP and to some extent La Salle, will dominate the playoffs. The standings might shift—maybe NU pulls off a surprise or UST finds their footing—but the core lesson from Cone's Kings remains: in a low-scoring game, every move matters, and that's where champions are made. As we head into the final stretch, keep an eye on those defensive battles; they might not fill highlight reels, but they'll decide who lifts the trophy, and in my book, that's what makes this season unforgettable.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover
