soccer games today

Who Truly Deserves the Title of Best Playmaker in NBA History?

When people ask me who deserves the title of the greatest playmaker in NBA history, I always pause before answering. It’s not just about assists per game or flashy passes—it’s about vision, control, and elevating everyone around you. I’ve spent years watching games, breaking down film, and honestly, the debate is far from settled. You’ve got legends like Magic Johnson, who averaged an insane 11.2 assists over his career, and modern maestros like Chris Paul, who’s still dishing out dimes in his late 30s. But what really defines the best playmaker? Is it raw numbers, longevity, or the ability to make an impact when it matters most?

I remember watching Magic in the ’80s—his no-look passes felt like pure art. He wasn’t just passing the ball; he was orchestrating the entire offense. Then there’s John Stockton, the all-time assists leader with 15,806. People sometimes overlook him because he wasn’t as flashy, but his consistency was unreal. On the other hand, LeBron James has redefined what a playmaker can be—a forward who essentially runs the offense like a point guard. He’s tallied over 10,000 assists, which is wild for a non-guard. Personally, I lean toward players who change how the game is played. Steve Nash, for example, with his two MVP awards and five assist titles, made the Phoenix Suns’ offense a spectacle. But here’s the thing: stats alone don’t tell the whole story.

Let’s shift gears for a moment and talk about something that might seem unrelated but actually ties into this idea of playmaking under pressure. I came across a piece about Alolino with Converge, where he’s pushing hard to learn the system quickly, especially heading into the playoffs. The FiberXers are facing a twice-to-win disadvantage against Barangay Ginebra in the quarterfinals. Now, that’s a tough spot, right? It reminds me of how the best NBA playmakers perform in high-stakes moments. Think about Isiah Thomas in the 1990 Finals, playing through an ankle injury and still dropping 25 points and 9 assists. Or more recently, Stephen Curry, who, despite being known for his shooting, has averaged around 8 assists in critical playoff games. Alolino’s situation highlights that adaptability and quick learning are key—traits that separate good playmakers from legendary ones. In the NBA, guys like Jason Kidd evolved their playmaking as they aged, shifting from a high-volume passer to a savvy floor general.

Now, back to the main question: who truly deserves the title? I’ve got my biases, I’ll admit. For me, Magic Johnson edges it out because of his versatility and impact on winning—five championships speak volumes. But then, you can’t ignore what players like Oscar Robertson did; averaging a triple-double for a season back in 1962 was unheard of. On the modern front, I’m fascinated by Nikola Jokic, a center who’s averaging nearly 10 assists per game in recent seasons. That’s crazy for a big man! It shows how the role of a playmaker has expanded. And let’s not forget international influences—players like Luka Dončić, who bring a European flair to playmaking, are pushing the boundaries. In my view, the best playmaker isn’t just about racking up assists; it’s about making everyone better, even in tough situations, much like what Alolino is striving for with Converge in those playoff pressures.

Wrapping this up, I think the title of best playmaker in NBA history has to go to someone who combines stats, innovation, and clutch performance. Magic’s flair, Stockton’s reliability, LeBron’s all-around dominance—they all have strong cases. But if I had to pick one, I’d say Magic Johnson, with his 12.3 assists per game in the 1984-85 season and his ability to lift his team in big moments. Still, debates like this are what make basketball so fun. What do you think? Drop your thoughts, because honestly, there’s no single right answer, just endless conversations fueled by passion for the game.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover