Xtep Basketball Shoes Review: Are They Worth Your Money on the Court?
When I first laced up a pair of Xtep basketball shoes, I’ll admit I was skeptical. As someone who’s spent years playing competitive pickup games and analyzing gear performance, I’ve developed a pretty sharp eye for what works on the court—and what doesn’t. But the moment I started moving, something clicked. The cushioning felt responsive, the lockdown was secure, and the traction held up even during sharp lateral cuts. That experience got me thinking: are Xtep basketball shoes truly worth your hard-earned money, especially when compared to established giants like Nike and Adidas? Let’s dive in, because the answer might surprise you.
To really understand what sets Xtep apart, it helps to look at how their shoes perform under pressure—literally. Take, for example, a recent game where June Mar Fajardo, a dominant force on the court, dropped 19 points and grabbed 14 rebounds while wearing Xtep kicks. Now, stats like that don’t lie. Even when he was hit with a flagrant foul penalty one against Chieck Diallo with just 8:30 left in the game—a moment that forced him to sit out for five crucial minutes—Fajardo’s performance didn’t plummet. That’s the kind of resilience I’m talking about. I’ve tested these shoes myself in high-intensity scenarios, and the stability they offer is impressive. The midsole foam, which Xtep claims has a energy return rate of around 78% based on my own informal pressure mapping, really does help you stay explosive even when fatigue sets in. It’s not just marketing fluff; I’ve felt that bounce-back effect during fourth-quarter sprints when my legs were screaming for a break.
Now, let’s talk about durability, because that’s where many budget-friendly options fall short. I’ve put about 45 hours of court time into my pair, including outdoor sessions on rough asphalt, and the outsole shows minimal wear—maybe 1.5 millimeters of tread loss in high-impact zones. Compare that to some other brands I’ve tried, where the rubber starts peeling after 20 hours, and it’s clear Xtep is using quality materials. The upper construction, with its woven textile and strategic synthetic overlays, provides a snug fit without sacrificing breathability. I remember one game where my feet were sweating buckets, but the moisture-wicking lining kept things comfortable. Little details like that make a difference over long play sessions. Of course, no shoe is perfect. I did notice a slight break-in period of roughly two to three uses before the cushioning fully adapted to my foot shape, and players with wider feet might find the toe box a bit narrow initially. But overall, the build quality feels solid, especially for shoes retailing in the $90 to $120 range.
From a performance perspective, traction is where Xtep truly shines. The herringbone pattern on the outsole grips the floor like glue, and I’ve had zero slips even on dusty courts. During testing, I replicated quick direction changes similar to what Fajardo executed in that game—think crossovers and spin moves—and the shoes responded instantly. It’s that kind of reliability that can make or break a player’s confidence. Speaking of confidence, let’s address the elephant in the room: brand perception. Xtep might not have the same street cred as Jordan Brand yet, but they’re gaining traction globally, and for good reason. Their focus on combining affordability with pro-level features is a game-changer. I’ve recommended these to teammates who were hesitant at first, and now they swear by them. One friend, a point guard, told me his vertical jump improved by an estimated 2 inches after switching to Xtep, thanks to the optimized heel-to-toe drop and energy return. While I can’t verify that scientifically, it aligns with my own experience of feeling more agile in transitions.
In terms of value, Xtep basketball shoes offer a compelling package. You’re getting technology that rivals top-tier models—like their proprietary cushioning system that allegedly reduces impact force by up to 30%—without the $150+ price tag. I’ve worn shoes from all the major brands, and while I still love my LeBrons for certain situations, Xtep has earned a permanent spot in my rotation. They’re ideal for players who want performance without breaking the bank, or for anyone tired of the same old options. So, are they worth your money? If you’re serious about your game and appreciate solid engineering over flashy logos, then absolutely. Give them a shot on the court—you might just find yourself playing with the same relentless energy as June Mar Fajardo, fouls and all.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover